Frisco Teen Indicted for Murder of Classmate; Prosecutors Consider Death Penalty

The fatal incident occurred on April 2, 2025, at Kuykendall Stadium, where Austin Metcalf—a popular athlete and student—was attacked and later pronounced dead at the scene. The tragedy stunned the Frisco community and sparked months of speculation about what led to the confrontation.

With the indictment now confirmed, Anthony faces first-degree murder charges, and prosecutors have signaled their intent to pursue the harshest possible penalty under Texas law.

“We Want Justice — No Exceptions”

Outside the courthouse, emotions ran high as Austin’s parents, Jeff and Karen Metcalf, spoke publicly for the first time since the indictment.

“My son deserves justice,” Jeff Metcalf said. “If you’re old enough to take a life in cold blood, you’re old enough to face the consequences. No exceptions.”

Fighting back tears, Karen Metcalf added,

“We’ve put our faith in the system. We just want accountability. Austin was our world.”

In the weeks following the tragedy, a GoFundMe campaign launched to support funeral expenses and what organizers called “justice for Austin.” Within days, donations surpassed $500,000, reflecting both community grief and solidarity.

However, the fundraising effort also sparked debate online after reports surfaced that the family had used some of the funds for new vehicles and a rental home. Supporters defended the family’s choices, urging compassion and privacy during their time of mourning.

The Defense Responds

Meanwhile, defense attorney Mike Howard insisted that Karmelo Anthony acted in self-defense. Speaking outside Collin County Jail, he told reporters:

“Karmelo is a 17-year-old kid. He acted to protect himself. The truth will come out in court, and we intend to fight these charges vigorously.”

When asked about the prosecution’s decision to seek the death penalty, Howard was unequivocal:

“Every Texan has the right to defend themselves. If the state pursues the death penalty, we will challenge it every step of the way.”

Legal Debate Reignited

The case has reignited a statewide debate over the death penalty for minors. Legal analyst Rachel Nguyen noted that while rare, Texas law does allow capital punishment for defendants aged 17 in certain circumstances.

“It’s legally permissible but controversial,” Nguyen said. “Given the age of the accused and the gravity of the charge, this case could draw national attention and possibly reach higher courts.”

What Comes Next

As the trial date approaches, Frisco remains deeply divided. Supporters of the Metcalf family have vowed to fill the courtroom, while Anthony’s friends and advocates argue that his actions were misunderstood and that he deserves a fair hearing.

The case raises difficult questions—about justice, youth, accountability, and the limits of self-defense. For now, one thing is certain: the outcome of this trial will have lasting implications not only for the families involved but for the entire Texas justice system.