Logo

NFL Officially Hands Down “Double Penalties” to Two Giants Players for Unnecessary Physical Actions Against LB Christian Elliss in Patriots’ MNF Victory

Foxborough, Massachusetts – December 3, 2025

The NFL has officially issued supplemental discipline following the fiery sideline brawl at Gillette Stadium during the Patriots’ 33–15 Monday Night Football win over the Giants. According to the league office announcement, two New York Giants players – tight end Theo Johnson and center John Michael Schmitz – have received “double penalties” for violent conduct directed at Patriots linebacker Christian Elliss late in the first half. This action reaffirms the NFL’s zero-tolerance stance on behavior that crosses the line of competitive emotion.

The controversial play stemmed from a legal but extremely hard hit by Christian Elliss on rookie quarterback Jaxson Dart as he scrambled along the sideline for extra yards. Dart was sent flying out of bounds, triggering immediate outrage from Giants players. Johnson immediately charged in and shoved Elliss hard from behind, followed by Schmitz rushing in to escalate the situation, turning it into a chaotic sideline brawl. While on-field officials only flagged penalties at the time, the league stated it would review the video further — and today the decision was finalized.

Per the official notice, Theo Johnson will be fined the maximum amount allowed for unnecessary roughness, while John Michael Schmitz faces both a fine and a special warning for expanding the altercation. The NFL described the actions as “intentional and beyond the scope of teammate protection.” Notably, Elliss did not retaliate, and no Patriots players received any supplemental discipline.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell issued a strong statement on the incident. “We understand football is an emotional sport, but any violent conduct outside the rules is unacceptable. Protecting players, officials, and sideline personnel will always be our top priority. When there is clear evidence of intentional confrontation, we are obligated to act to preserve respect and safety in the league.” The statement was immediately endorsed by numerous former players.

The NFL’s decision has been widely regarded as fair by both social media and traditional media, especially given the unwanted chaos the moment created during the game. The Patriots continue to solidify their AFC standing, while the Giants face another week of off-field noise. This story serves as a reminder to every team that no matter how heated things get, composure is required — especially when every play can be scrutinized by the league long after the whistle.

1303 views
Just Ahead of the New Year Showdown 49ers vs. Seahawks — Brock Purdy Sparks Controversy After Refusing to Wear the L.G.B.T Captain’s Armband, as the 49ers Respond to the Decision
Jan 1, 2026 Share this article:Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on WhatsAppCopy link San Francisco, California – Just days before the regular-season finale welcoming in the new year between the San Francisco 49ers and the Seattle Seahawks, 49ers Nation was unexpectedly pulled into a heated off-field debate. This time, the focus was not on game plans, playoff scenarios, or matchups on the field — but on a personal decision made by the quarterback leading the team: Brock Purdy. According to multiple reports, Purdy declined to wear a captain’s armband featuring an L.G.B.T message ahead of the Week 18 matchup with Seattle. The decision quickly sparked divided reactions across social media and within the fan base. Some argued that the NFL’s platform should continue to be used to amplify social causes, while others maintained that players should retain the right to separate football from broader societal conversations. As the discussion intensified, Purdy chose to address the situation directly — not to challenge or dismiss any community, but to clearly explain his personal stance in a calm and respectful manner. “I respect everyone in the community, no matter who they are. But to me, football is a sport of focus, toughness, and responsibility to the people next to you. I believe the field should be a place where we concentrate on the game and our commitment to the team. My respect is real — but the way I express it has to align with who I am and what I believe.” The statement was not intended to deny or undermine any group. Instead, it outlined how Purdy views his role: as a leader whose primary responsibility is to the locker room, the game, and the city he represents. Still, the comments further fueled debate online, highlighting the increasingly blurred line between professional sports and social issues in today’s NFL. From the organization’s standpoint, the 49ers moved quickly to respond. Team officials emphasized that they respect Brock Purdy’s personal decision, while reaffirming the franchise’s ongoing commitment to diversity, inclusion, and mutual respect. The organization made clear that players are entitled to individual choices, provided those decisions do not compromise professionalism or team unity. Inside the locker room, sources indicate that Purdy’s decision did not create division. Teammates continue to view him as a steady presence and the quarterback responsible for guiding the team through high-pressure moments. With Week 18 carrying both symbolic weight and major playoff implications, the focus inside the building remains firmly on execution against Seattle. The NFL has long existed at the intersection of sports and society, and controversies of this nature are often unavoidable. For Purdy, this moment represented a willingness to confront public scrutiny head-on rather than avoid it — even as opinions remained sharply divided. When the ball is kicked off against the Seahawks and the new year officially begins, the debate may still linger. But on the field, San Francisco needs Brock Purdy focused on one thing above all else: winning. And ultimately, that remains the standard by which quarterbacks — and teams — are judged in the NFL.